AI Research Navigator● Evidence gate activeMQ

SOURCE-AUDITED RESEARCH · DAILY INGESTION ACTIVE

AI research you can trace
—claim by claim.

Primary-source research translated into business implications without invented activity, synthetic metrics, or unsupported performance claims.

Research records5All directly cited
Publishers3Official domains only
Synthetic metrics0Unsupported claims removed
Business journeys5Clearly labeled analysis

HUMAN-APPROVED DAILY DIGEST

No approved digest available

The ingestion pipeline can prepare a draft, but nothing appears here until it passes citation checks and the owner explicitly publishes it.

RUNTIME RAG

Ask the verified corpus

Queries run against a durable vector index containing only approved primary-source records. Low-evidence questions return an abstention.

CURATED REFERENCE ARCHIVE · REVIEWED AUGUST 30, 2026

Primary-source intelligence

These reference records are not the daily feed. Reported facts are attributed to the publisher; limitations are disclosed beside each claim.
A

Anthropic · August 28, 2026 Alignment

Automated researchers can reliably mitigate alignment failures

Publisher reports: Anthropic reports that Claude found methods that improved the target benchmarks for all 10 tested alignment failures without degrading capabilities.

Boundary: Publisher-reported benchmark research; this audit verifies provenance and wording, not independent replication of the experiments.

AlignmentSafety Verified August 30, 2026
A

Anthropic · August 18, 2026 AI for science

How Claude is accelerating protein design and analytical chemistry

Publisher reports: Anthropic reports that Claude designed binders against 15 protein targets and succeeded against 14; external evaluators produced and tested the designs in a wet lab.

Boundary: The results cover specified experimental tasks and setups; they do not establish end-to-end drug-development performance.

ScienceAgents Verified August 30, 2026
A

Anthropic · August 13, 2026 Multi-agent systems

Patterns and problems in emerging multiagent systems

Publisher reports: Anthropic reports an experiment using 45 agents, separate virtual machines, a shared forum, and an arbiter to search 15 open-source projects for vulnerabilities.

Boundary: The paper also documents coordination failures and warns that current multi-agent systems remain immature.

AgentsCybersecurity Verified August 30, 2026
N

NVIDIA · May 31, 2026 Physical AI

NVIDIA launches Cosmos 3 for physical AI

Publisher reports: NVIDIA describes Cosmos 3 as an omnimodal world-model family connecting understanding, generation, simulation, and action across language, image, video, audio, and actions.

Boundary: Capabilities and benchmark positioning are vendor-reported; production suitability depends on independent evaluation for the target environment.

Physical AIRobotics Verified August 30, 2026
O

OpenAI · July 29, 2026 Research access

Accelerating scientific discovery with ChatGPT for Academic Researchers

Publisher reports: OpenAI announced a program intended to expand free frontier-model access to 100,000 eligible researchers through 2027, beginning with a 10,000-seat cohort.

Boundary: This is a program commitment and access plan, not evidence that 100,000 researchers have already received access.

ResearchEducation Verified August 30, 2026

Verification confirms provenance and faithful summary. It does not independently reproduce publisher experiments.

EVIDENCE TO APPLICATION

Source-linked business journeys

These are transparent analyst interpretations—not publisher-reported ROI, deployed products, or guaranteed outcomes.
Analyst interpretation

AI safety & governance

Alignment evaluation workflow

Define failure modeRun benchmarkChallenge mitigationHuman approval

A governed enterprise pattern for testing proposed safeguards before model or agent changes are released.

Evidence basis
Analyst interpretation

Life sciences

AI-assisted protein design

Define targetGenerate candidatesComputational screenWet-lab validation

A human-controlled discovery workflow in which AI proposes candidates and laboratory testing remains the evidence gate.

Evidence basis
Analyst interpretation

Cybersecurity

Multi-agent vulnerability research

Partition codeIndependent searchPeer reviewArbiter validation

A bounded parallel-research pattern that requires independent validation and explicit controls for coordination failure.

Evidence basis
Analyst interpretation

Robotics & industrial

Physical-AI simulation workflow

Observe environmentModel world stateSimulate outcomeValidate action

A potential evaluation pattern for physical systems; the source does not establish readiness for any specific production deployment.

Evidence basis
Analyst interpretation

Academic R&D

Research-assistance workflow

Frame questionReview evidenceAnalyze dataResearcher validation

A researcher-in-control workflow aligned with the tools and support described in OpenAI's access program.

Evidence basis

TECHNICAL AUTHENTICITY ARCHITECTURE

Runtime RAG, deterministic, and human-reviewed

The retrieval runtime is intentionally constrained to the source-audited corpus and generates only extractive, citation-bound responses.
Runtime RAG status: Active. D1 vector persistence, deterministic 256-dimensional embeddings, controlled vocabulary normalization, cosine similarity, top-k retrieval, corpus versioning, confidence thresholding, retrieval telemetry, and fail-closed abstention are implemented. No autonomous crawler or unrestricted LLM generation is claimed.
01

Primary-source retrieval

Research is retrieved from official publisher domains rather than anonymous summaries or social posts.

02

Claim-level provenance

Each factual summary is bound to its source URL, publisher, publication date, and human verification timestamp.

03

Deterministic validation

A typed, domain-allowlisted publication function fails closed when required evidence or limitations are absent.

04

Epistemic labeling

Publisher-reported facts, experiment boundaries, and analyst interpretations are presented as distinct information classes.

05

Human-in-the-loop review

A human audit validates source identity, claim fidelity, dates, and caveats before publication.

06

Freshness and versioning

The edition carries an explicit audit date; future changes require re-verification rather than silent replacement.

07

Hybrid retrieval

A 256-dimensional deterministic embedding, keyword overlap, optional industry/date filtering, and cosine reranking search curated records plus newly ingested source chunks.

08

Grounded generation

The runtime uses source-bound extractive synthesis: it can present retrieved claims and limitations, but cannot invent prose beyond the approved evidence.

Retrieve official sourceExtract bounded claimAttach provenanceChallenge limitationsHuman approvalPublish or abstain

SPECIALIZED VERIFICATION CONTROL

Evidence Gate,
not simulated agent activity.

A deterministic publication gate checks provenance completeness before any record renders. It is intentionally stricter—and more honest—than displaying fictional agents, scan counts, schedules, or live statuses.

✓ Primary sources✓ Claim boundaries✓ Human audit date

Verification controls ● ENFORCED

Primary-source allowlistOnly official publisher domains can pass the publication gate.PASS
Claim-level provenanceEvery card carries a direct URL, publication date, and audit date.PASS
Fact / analysis separationPublisher-reported facts and Mir's interpretation are visibly separated.PASS
Fail-closed publicationMissing provenance or limitations block a record from rendering.PASS
No synthetic performance dataInvented ROI, scores, scan counts, and agent activity are prohibited.PASS
Runtime RAGQuestions use a versioned D1 vector store, deterministic embeddings, top-k retrieval, citations, and abstention.PASS